
Your weekly perch for all things real estate.
The President revives an originally Democratic proposal to ban Wall Street from buying too many rental homes, and the internet is cheering like it just watched the villain get defeated in a Marvel movie. But plot twist: the real villain might not be who you think it is, and this superhero move could actually make housing more expensive. Grab your pitchforks… but maybe read the fine print first.
NEST NUMBERS

Source: Zillow, Freddie Mac, CNBC, Redfin, Apartment List, CME FedWatch
3% OWNERSHIP… 100% BLAME

Story: President Trump announced on January 7th that he's taking "immediate steps" to ban large institutional investors from purchasing single-family homes, declaring that "people live in homes, not corporations." This was a policy proposal initiated by the Democrats last year. The move targets private equity funds and REITs that buy housing in bulk, not your neighbor who owns a rental duplex. Sounds like a slam dunk for affordability, right? Here's the problem: institutional investors purchase less than 3% of all homes, and private equity firms account for just 1.6% of rental homes nationwide. Meanwhile, similar bans in Atlanta, Canada, and the Netherlands either failed to move the needle on prices or actively made things worse by strangling rental supply and scaring off development capital. The real culprits: Locked-in sellers clinging to 3% mortgages, restrictive zoning laws, and glacial permitting processes.
So What? If you're a real estate investor or property manager, this is a classic case of treating the symptom while ignoring the disease. Banning institutional capital won't magically create more homes, lower interest rates, or fix the zoning laws that make it illegal to build anything but a detached single-family home on 75% of urban land. What it could do is remove a source of funding for new construction and build-to-rent communities, the exact supply we desperately need. For SFR investors, the immediate impact is likely minimal since you're not the target, but watch for ripple effects on development pipelines and rental inventory in markets that relied on institutional capital.
What’s Next? Trump has called on Congress to codify the ban, so expect legislative battles ahead. Keep an eye on how "institutional investor" gets defined; previous proposals have ranged from funds owning 50+ homes to those with $100M+ in assets. If you're in build-to-rent or development, monitor how this affects capital availability. And for everyone else? The boring fundamentals (zoning reform, permitting speed, and interest rate trajectories) remain the actual levers that will determine whether housing becomes affordable. This policy makes for great tweets but historically poor economics.
Source: CNBC
The SFR leasing environment is sending mixed signals. The strategies that worked last year aren’t all holding up. Join Evernest’s Director of Leasing Brett Drevlow and Pricing Manager Bryan Shaw for a live webinar where we’ll break down what we’re seeing across demand, pricing, and renter behavior—and what it means for leasing performance in the months ahead.
NEST PICKS
Top Weekly Stories:
1️⃣ Housing: Trump's order for a $200 billion mortgage bond purchase pushed rates below 6% for the first time in nearly three years, giving buyers on a $3,000/month budget roughly $30,000 more purchasing power since the summer. 🪺 More
2️⃣ Build To Rent: Invitation Homes dropped $89 million to acquire ResiBuilt, bringing build-to-rent construction in-house and signaling that SFR REITs are done waiting for builders to return their calls. 🪺 More
3️⃣ Mortgages: The 30-year fixed rate fell to 6.06% (its lowest since September 2022) as Trump's mortgage bond announcement sent MBS prices surging and gave the lock-in effect its first real crack. 🪺 More
4️⃣ Interesting Trends: December existing home sales ticked up 5.1% to 4.35 million (SAAR), but 2025 still finished bouncing along the bottom despite improved affordability, proving that "better" and "good" are very different things. 🪺 More
5️⃣ Policy Changes: Wisconsin Rep. Scott Fitzgerald wants to eliminate capital gains taxes on home sales entirely, arguing baby boomers are sitting on properties like dragons on gold hoards because they don't want to write Uncle Sam a massive check. 🪺 More
INVESTOR HIGHLIGHTS:
🎙️ Podcast Highlight: Hoarder Houses: Goldmine or Money Pit? What Smart Investors Know Before Buying
📰 Article Highlight: The Best Real Estate Strategy for Building Financial Freedom in 2026
💸 Off-Market Deal: Turnkey 2BR in Hoover- Long-term tenant in place - $159,000


